Oh no.

God help us all.

When is a bill not just a bill?

Link here .

Tiger back for The Masters?

I hope this doesn't turn in to a "isn't this a wonderful story" telecast.

I was a pretty big fan, but the guy turns out to be a scumbag. If he plays well enough to win, great.

But please, please, don't turn this into a heart-warming triumph over adversity storyline.

Ughh.

Harsh view of the President, but worthy of discussion.

I think I've mentioned it here before, but count me among those less than impressed with our current President. Important questions about his qualifications and background were never asked. Too late now. This sums up some of my thoughts:

We have a president who believes that he is always the smartest man in the room, no matter what room. Actually, he is always the least experienced and probably least qualified in any room. The fact of the matter is that he has no experience in anything.

What is known of his background includes stints as a "community organizer" and an adjunct professor. What skills are required to be a community organizer? What experience is gleaned? No experience that is useful or transferable to an executive role.

Obama's short stint as a lecturer of constitutional law was unremarkable in any academic sense. No evidence of writing or publishing can be found. The most notable aspect was his interpretation of the Constitution. He views the Constitution as a "living document," open to changes that produce "social justice." In effect, other than as a quaint artifact of history, for Obama, the Constitution does not exist.

From Monty Pelerin at American Thinker. Here's the link.